Eksplorasi Ke-Esaan Allah dan Monoteisme Kristologi dalam Perspektif Markus 12:29
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63422/mk.v2i1.15Keywords:
Keesaan Allah, Monoteisme Kristologi, Markus 12:29, Tritunggal, Hypostasis Union.Abstract
This study aims to investigate the concept of divine unity and Christological monotheism as articulated in Mark 12:29. Comprehending the unity of God is essential, as it underpins Christian theological frameworks. The proclamation of God's oneness articulated by Jesus in Mark 12:29 resonates with the Shema. This declaration has significant implications for elucidating Jesus' identity and mission, wherein Jesus also asserts the cohesiveness of God from a triune perspective. Furthermore, Mark employs elevated Christological terminology without diminishing the humanity of Jesus. This notion is further underscored by the doctrine of hypostatic union, which elucidates the dual nature of Christ. Jesus' affirmation of God's unity in Mark 12:29 articulates a statement concerning the uniqueness of God that aligns with Jewish monotheistic traditions. Concurrently, Mark portrays Jesus as the embodiment of God's promise, whereby God actively engages in the historical narrative of human existence. Utilizing a descriptive qualitative research methodology, the author endeavors to examine divine unity and Christological monotheism through the lens of Mark 12:29. The author concludes that this examination reinforces the doctrine of the Trinity while also affirming both the divinity and humanity of Jesus.
Downloads
References
Blachowicz, James. “Monotheism and the Spirituality of Reason.” Zygon 37, no. 2 (2002): 511–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00446.
Boring, M. Eugene. “Markan Christology: God-Language for Jesus?” New Testament Studies 45, no. 4 (1999): 451–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688598000459.
Brower, Kent E. “6. Mark.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 44, no. 5 (2022): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064x221104322.
Byers, Andrew. “The One Body of the Shema in 1 Corinthians: An Ecclesiology of Christological Monotheism.” New Testament Studies 62, no. 4 (2016): 517–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688516000163.
Goodey, Daniel. “The Centrality of the Trinity: Exploring the Significance for Christians, Catechists and Deacons.” Revista Guillermo de Ockham 17, no. 1 (2019): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.4087.
Haardt, Maaike de, and Anna-Marie J.A.C.M. Korte. “The Boundaries of Monotheism: Interdisciplinary Explorations into the Foundations of Western Monotheism.” In The Boundaries of Monotheism: Interdisciplinary Explorations into the Foundations of Western Monotheism, 106–128. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004173163.i-250.
Hughes, Kyle R. “The Spirit and the Scriptures: Revisiting Cyprian’s Use of Prosopological Exegesis.” Journal of Early Christian History 8, no. 2 (2018): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2018.1429941.
Irving, Alexander J.D. “The Hypostatic Union as Normative over the Relation of God’s Self-Revelation and Human Cognition in the Thought of t.F. Torrance.” Irish Theological Quarterly 83, no. 3 (2018): 250–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021140018768364.
Kervin, William S. “Dimensions of Worship in the Shema: Resources for Christian Liturgical Theology.” Studies in Religion-Sciences Religieuses 48, no. 1 (2019): 115–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429819828670.
Lacugna, Catherine Mowry. “God for Us: The Trinity and Christian Life.” Horizons 20, no. 1 (1993): 135–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0360966900026864.
Marshall, Bruce D. “The Unity of the Triune God: Reviving an Ancient Question.” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 74 (2017): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1353/THO.2010.0000.
Miller, James C. “ Francesco Filannino. The Theological Programme of Mark: Exegesis and Function of Mark 1:1, 2–15 .” Bulletin for Biblical Research 32, no. 4 (2022): 466–68. https://doi.org/10.5325/bullbiblrese.32.4.0466.
Minor, Mitzi. “Living the Kingdom of God: The Communal and Renewing Spirituality of Jesus in Mark.” Religions 14, no. 9 (2023): 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091096.
Numada, Jonathan. “Christological Rereading of the Shema (Deut 6.4) in Mark’s Gospel.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 65, no. 1 (2022): 176–78.
Nwaigbo, F. “Faith in the One God in Christian and African Traditional Religions: A Theological Appraisal.” OGIRISI: A New Journal of African Studies 7, no. 1 (2010): 56–68. https://doi.org/10.4314/og.v7i1.57922.
Odeoye, Moses Adeleke. “Hebrews Articulating Hypostatic Union with Christ.” Journal of Asian Orientation in Theology 05, no. 02 (2023): 167–82. https://doi.org/10.24071/jaot.v5i2.6108.
Perzyński, Andrzej Piotr. “Christians and Jews: Historical and Theological Perspectives of Their Relationship.” Studia Oecumenica 19 (2019): 329–48. https://doi.org/10.25167/so.1087.
Smith, Brandon D. “What Christ Does, God Does: Surveying Recent Scholarship on Christological Monotheism.” Currents in Biblical Research 17, no. 2 (2019): 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993x18814063.
Söding, Thomas. “Das Evangelium Nach Markus.” In Das Evangelium Nach Markus, 2:I–XXVI. Theologischer Handkommentar Zum Neuen Testament (ThHK). Leipzig: EVA, 2022.
Stolz, Fritz. “Wesen Und Funktion von Monotheismus.” Evangelische Theologie 61, no. 3 (2001): 172–89. https://doi.org/10.14315/evth-2001-0303.
Strumiłowski, Jan P. “Epifanijne Znaczenie Konania Jezusa w Ogrójcu w Świetle Communicatio Idiomatum.” Polonia Sacra 21, no. 2 (2017): 185–203. https://doi.org/10.15633/ps.2139.
Tan, Kim Huat. “Jesus and the Shema.” In Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus, 2677–2707. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210219_088.
Tsunoda, Yuichi. “The Composite Union of Natures: A Study Comparing the Structures of Hypostatic Union in Chalcedonian Christology and of Dharm{=a}kara Bodhisattva in Shin Buddhism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Buddhist-Christian Studies, 414–27. Routledge, 2022.
Vollenweider, Samuel. “Zwischen Monotheismus Und Engelchristologie. Überlegungen Zur Frühgeschichte Des Christusglaubens.” Zeitschrift Fur Theologie Und Kirche 99 (2002): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-86672.
Watson, Francis. “The Triune Divine Identity: Reflections On Pauline God-Language, in Disagreement With J.D.G. Dunn.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 23, no. 80 (2001): 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X0102308006.
Webster, John. “Principles of Systematic Theology.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 11, no. 1 (2009): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2400.2008.00423.x.
Wells, Paul. “Christian Monotheism and Its Challengers.” Verbum Christi Jurnal Teologi Reformed Injili 9, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.51688/vc9.2.2022.art2.
West, M L. “Towards Monotheism.” In Pagan Monotheisma in Late Antiquity, 21–40. Oxford University Press, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198152521.003.0002.
Wolfe, Judith. “The Relevance of the Study of Christian Theology in the University and Society Today.” International Journal of Public Theology 16, no. 3 (2022): 263–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20220049.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didit Yuliantono Adi, Daniel Pesah Purwonugroho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
About copyright, the authors agree to the following terms:
1. Rights of Authors: The authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article. The authors are also permitted to reuse the substance of the article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or other purposes such as further research, lectures, books, or class discussions with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
2. Warranties from Authors: The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been previously published, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe on the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that the author has obtained any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources.
3. License to Publish and Archive: The authors grant Rumah Kristus: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen the right of first publication and distribution in electronic and print editions of the article simultaneously under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). If the manuscript is accepted to be published, the author should fill, sign and send back the License to Publish Agreement form. The authors also agree to grant Rumah Kristus: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen the right to create and store electronic archival copies of the article.
